#Treesize for linux windows#
> Is there any way to get ls -lR or better rsync as fast as listing the directory with Windows tools? > Runnin "ls -lR" a second time on Cygwin is fast as lightning as it only takes less than 30s. Ping an AD server or some sort of other network lookup that is going There are more than 50 alternatives to TreeSize for a variety of platforms, including Windows, Linux, Mac, BSD and KDE. Things.) If the lookups for mapping metadata permissions is having to Have an AD server giving out perms it will look different from other 'look sane' (this is highly dependent on your environment. I would then check to see if perms and metadata on that directory On a slow drive may be a spinup/get-data/spindown cycle to make it Each one of those is going to be a separate action which Unix permissions then comparing if those items are the same on the Time getting the metadata off of one of the disks and mapping it to but maybe an excerpt) I am expecting it is spending a lot of (I don't recommend sending that to the list as it will be a lot ofĭata. The best open source Linux alternative is Baobab Disk Usage Analyzer. I would add a bunch of verbose to the rsync to see what it is doing. TreeSize is not available for Linux but there are plenty of alternatives that runs on Linux with similar functionality. As ls -lR needs the same information I would have expected it to take the same time. Reading all file sizes with Treesize also took less than one minute. Using Windows Explorer (after a reboot to guarantee that the cache is empty) to get the total number of files and the total size took only a few seconds. On the linux server this took about 1 minute (only slightly faster magnetic disk, empty read cache at start) and doing the same on cygwin took almost as long as rsync (over 40 minutes). > As rsync was only transferring a small number of bytes and gave no clue to the cause for being so slow and as rsync should only need filenames, dates and sizes I did a "ls -lR|wc" on both systems. > rsync -avx -stats -whole-file -no-perms -no-owner -no-group > I am using the following command line on the linux server: > Even if there are no changes and whith whole file transfers rsync takes about 45 minutes to come to this conclusion. I am not sure if the Linux box has the slow disk or the Windows box
#Treesize for linux archive#
The directory contains almost 1 TB of images and videos in about 160k files on a slow disk (Seagate Archive 8TB with SMR) with NTFS. If the program is run as administrator, the space requirements of directories for which the user has no access rights can also be checked.
#Treesize for linux free#
> I am running rsync on a small linux server to synchronize files in one directory and its subdirectories from Windows (using sshd from Cygwin) to this server for backup purposes. TreeSize- Free storage space finder According to its developers, it uses Master File Table, MFT for short, that helps TreeSize to achieve extremely high speed in the hard disk scanning process. Next message (by thread): rsync and ls -lR slow for directories with many files.Previous message (by thread): rsync and ls -lR slow for directories with many files.Rsync and ls -lR slow for directories with many files Stephen John Smoogen Jan 5 21:22: Rsync and ls -lR slow for directories with many files
0 kommentar(er)
